The Senate may no longer push for the adoption of a resolution seeking a review of the Supreme Court鈥檚 (SC) decision to grant a quo warranto petition to oust former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.
Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon听said on Tuesday that senators may now be听鈥渞eluctant鈥� to tackle the resolution after the high court affirmed its earlier decision to oust Sereno.
READ: SC rejects Sereno ouster appeal
鈥淎s a practical matter, the majority in the Senate can assert that the issue is now academic and would therefore be reluctant to debate on the quo warranto resolution,鈥� he told reporters.
Majority of his colleagues may also no longer see the need for the Senate to express its sense as an institution.
鈥淲hile personally I still believe that there is nothing wrong with expressing an opinion on a decision of the SC, the majority may feel that we can express our individual beliefs on the quo warranto but not the Senate听as an institution,鈥� he said.
At least 14 senators previously signed filed a resolution urging the SC to review its decision to oust Sereno through a quo warranto petition.
READ: 14 senators ask SC to review Sereno ruling
The resolution was briefly debated on the floor on the last session day before the chamber adjourned for a legislative break.
Drilon said he was not surprised that the SC refused to reverse its ruling as it鈥檚 really difficult to reverse a decision rendered by the majority of justices.
鈥淎s I said at the start of all of these questions, this is a slippery slope. Now, any officer who is subject to impeachment can now be removed through a quo warranto proceeding,鈥� he said.
Other views
Drilon鈥檚 colleagues, however, believe that the resolution could be still be adopted.
Sen. Aquilino Pimentel III said the Senate could still adopt the resolution to express the 鈥渟ense of the Senate.鈥�
鈥淚t is not meant for any other purpose. Hence, it can be passed anytime depending on the sense of the majority,鈥� he said.
For his part, Sen. Panfilo Lacson, who had questioned the proposed resolution, agreed that it would still be taken up on the plenary floor.
鈥淲hile it is obvious that the SC鈥檚 final ruling on the petition for quo warranto has rendered the draft resolution moot, academic and without purpose, still, its disposition is something that we as a collegial body will have to vote upon when the third regular session of the 17th Congress opens in July,鈥� he said.
Meanwhile, Senator Antonio Trillanes IV听said that with the SC decision, President Rodrigo Duterte has again 鈥渟ucceeded in destroying another bulwark of our fragile Democracy, the Supreme Court.鈥�
鈥淣ow, only half of the Senate stands in his way from completely installing his ruthless and corrupt authoritarian regime,鈥� he said. 鈥� with reports from DJ Yap /ee
听