What happened to 36 witnesses vs Trillanes? Ex-senator’s lawyer wonders

ºÚÁÏÉç

AS PROSECUTION ATTEMPTED TO PRESENT WITNESSES NOT IN ORIGINAL LIST

What happened to 36 witnesses vs Trillanes? Ex-senator’s lawyer wonders

By: - Reporter /
/ 06:50 PM October 07, 2019

MANILA, Philippines — Since retrial on the rebellion case against former senator Antonio Trillanes IV started early this year, government prosecutors have yet to present a single witness from the list they have submitted before Makati City Regional Trial Court Branch 150.

“Are they dispensing with the presentation of the previous witnesses listed because we don’t understand why they cannot present those witnesses considering that substantial time has elapsed since the case reopened,” Trillanes’ counsel, Atty. Reynaldo Robles, told reporters Monday.

“There is no reason for them not to be able to communicate with these individuals,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said it isn’t fair for the prosecution to add new witnesses without appropriate notice.

FEATURED STORIES

“It violates the rights of the accused to due process of law,” he pointed out.

The prosecution has so far presented only one witness since, and that was Assistant State Prosecutor Mary Jane Sytat during a hearing in July. She is not included in the list submitted to the Makati court.

Article continues after this advertisement

Last July 22, the prosecution announced that its next witness will either be Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) Chairman Danilo Lim or former Bureau of Corrections (BuCor) Director Nicanor Faeldon.

Article continues after this advertisement

However, during Monday’s hearing, the prosecution cited communication problems with Faeldon due to conflict in the Senate’s investigation about the good conduct time allowance (GCTA) mess.

Article continues after this advertisement

Instead, the prosecution has brought in court GMA TV reporter Tina Panganiban-Perez to testify on the video footage of her coverage of the 2007 Manila Peninsula siege.

Robles opposed the presentation of the new witness because Perez and two of her colleagues were not in the original list of witnesses submitted by the prosecution.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court gave Trillanes through Robles 10 days to submit their comments on the presentation of new witnesses.

The next hearing is set on November 18. /kga

RELATED STORIES

Faeldon, Lim to testify vs Trillanes

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

Makati Court revives Trillanes’ rebellion case

MOST READ
www
technology
globalnation
business
sports
TAGS: court, Local news, Nation, national news, ºÚÁÏÉç, Philippine news updates, Politics, rebellion

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

© Copyright 1997-2025 ºÚÁÏÉç | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.