An environmental law group has asked the provincial government of Palawan to suspend the implementation of an ordinance creating a new council that will oversee the management of protected areas in the province.
In a letter addressed to Palawan Gov. Jose Alvarez, Vice Gov. Dennis Socrates and members of the provincial board, the Environmental Legal Assistance Center (Elac) also sought the reconsideration of the rationale and purpose of Provincial Ordinance No. 2210, which was approved in February.
The ordinance provides for the creation of the Palawan Council for Protected Areas Management (PCPAM), which, among other objectives, will 鈥渆mpower the chief executive of the province of Palawan to effectively and efficiently manage the various protected areas in the province.鈥
Lawyer Grizelda Mayo-Anda, Elac executive director, said that while her group respected the interest of the provincial government in taking an active role in managing the province鈥檚 protected areas, any local law must be consistent with existing statutes and policies concerning these areas.
Special laws鈥淲hile Provincial Ordinance (No.) 2210 anchors its legal basis on Section 16, Article 2 of the Constitution and Section 16 of (Republic Act No.) 7160 (Local Government Code), we submit that such basis is wanting when it comes to protected areas,鈥 Anda said in the letter sent on Wednesday.
The management of protected areas, said Elac, is already enshrined in special laws, such as the Expanded National Integrated Protected Areas System (Enipas) law, which amended a 1992 legislation on protected areas, and the Strategic Environmental Plan for Palawan (SEP). Under Enipas law, a Protected Area Management Board (PAMB), a multisectoral body which includes local governments, oversees the management and governance of a particular protected area. The ordinance did not cite these laws in its legal basis.
Protected areas refer to identified portions of land and/or water 鈥渟et aside by reason of their unique physical and biological diversity鈥 and are protected against destructive human exploitation.
The Enipas law, signed by President Duterte in 2018, declared 94 protected areas as national parks, putting them under government protection and management. More than 100 areas were previously declared national parks through presidential proclamations.
However, not a single Palawan protected site, including the Puerto Princesa Underground River, El Nido Marine Reserve and Malampaya Sound, was included in the Enipas law.
In 2015, Alvarez argued that the SEP law was enough for the province to manage its protected areas.
Yet even with its exclusion, Palawan鈥檚 protected areas are not exempted from the framework provided under Enipas, said Anda.
鈥淭here is an overlap as far as governance and institutional arrangements are concerned,鈥 she told the Inquirer.
Carrying capacity
But Board Member Al Rama reiterated on Thursday that the ordinance, which he authored, was in harmony with existing laws.
The ordinance, he said, merely organizes several environmental management boards under the new local council for 鈥渆ffective future management.鈥
鈥淭here is no overlap,鈥 he said, noting that the PCPAM would ensure 鈥渃oordination and collaboration between the protected areas.鈥
鈥淒ue to the heavy workload of the existing agencies, it seems like they haven鈥檛 given priority to the aspect that we want to happen in the ordinance,鈥 he said.
One of the ordinance鈥檚 objectives is to 鈥渄etermine the carrying capacity of Palawan鈥 so the provincial government can identify the 鈥渞esources needed to support the population,鈥 Rama said.
鈥淔or example, if we anticipate an increase in our population, let鈥檚 say 5 million, we can quantify how many watersheds we need to protect,鈥 he added.
Anda, however, was unsure whether the provincial government was in the best position to care for these protected areas despite local officials鈥 鈥渟trong desire鈥 to take the lead. 鈥擶ITH A REPORT FROM ROMAR MIRANDA