Detained activist Reina Mae Nasino on Friday asked the Supreme Court to dismiss the Manila Regional Trial Court (RTC) judge who issued an order in August separating her from her infant daughter, who died of complications two months later.
In an administrative complaint filed by her mother, Marites Asis, and their counsel from the National Union of Peoples鈥 Lawyers (NUPL), Nasino accused Judge Marivic Balisi-Umali of Manila RTC Branch 20 of gross misconduct and gross ignorance of the law when she dismissed Nasino鈥檚 petition in July to be allowed to breastfeed her newborn daughter, River Emmanuelle.
They said Nasino had that right in accordance with law and international rules on the treatment of women detainees.
The 23-year-old activist gave birth to River on July 1, months after she was arrested by the police in a raid on an office of the militant group Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) in Tondo, Manila, in November 2019.
Nasino was detained and charged in Umali鈥檚 court with illegal possession of firearms and explosives.
Soon after River鈥檚 birth, Nasino asked the court to let her continue caring for her baby. The petition was denied and, in August, the court ordered the mother鈥檚 separation from her daughter, who was turned over to Asis.
鈥楻ight to breastfeed鈥
In the complaint seeking Umali鈥檚 dismissal from the judiciary, Nasino argued that the judge鈥檚 order ran counter to 鈥渋nternational law and domestic statutes recognizing mother and child鈥檚 right to breastfeed, as well as the best interests of the child.鈥
It cited as legal basis the Expanded Breastfeeding Promotion Act of 2009 (Republic Act No. 10028) and the policy on lactation station of the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP).
鈥淭he respondent judge ought to have known that the right to breastfeed, as a component of the constitutional right to health, is self-executory. As held by the Supreme Court, 鈥onstitutional provisions protecting and promoting the right to health are considered self-executory and need no legislation in order to be implemented,鈥 the complaint said.
Nasino鈥檚 lawyers also cited Umali鈥檚 order in July denying mother and child access to lactation facilities of Manila City Jail鈥檚 female dormitory.
Not only did Umali 鈥渃ommit errors of judgment, she unreasonably defeated the very purpose of the law and the rules under consideration and unfairly prejudiced the health and life [of the child],鈥 it said, adding:
鈥淚ndubitably, the respondent judge鈥檚 assailed orders gave way to the decline of baby River鈥檚 health, which eventually led to her tragic death (on Oct. 9).鈥
鈥楧egrading manner鈥
鈥淸Umali鈥檚] dismissal from the service is imperative,鈥 the complaint said. 鈥淓ven if this will not bring back baby River鈥檚 life or fill the void that she left in her mother鈥檚 heart, it will relieve the bench鈥攁nd the public鈥攐f a magistrate who has lost the requisite competence, integrity and impartiality that are fundamental to her office.鈥
Another court granted Nasino鈥檚 petition to be at River鈥檚 wake鈥攂ut only for two days鈥 at a Pandacan funeral parlor on Oct. 14 and to be at the child鈥檚 burial on Oct. 16.
Security arrangements for the funeral, however, came under heavy criticism from Nasino鈥檚 supporters, netizens and some politicians for being an 鈥渙verkill,鈥 as more than 20 police officers and jail guards in battle gear were deployed to control the crowd.
NUPL said Nasino may also file charges against the police and BJMP for their 鈥渋nhuman and degrading鈥 treatment of the grieving mother. 鈥擶ITH A REPORT FROM JODEE A. AGONCILLO