锘� DOJ: No retraction of testimony vs De Lima | Inquirer 黑料社

.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-ddbe185b-a45a-49f9-8f46-a71503fb5c9f: url('/single2017/images/quote-2021.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-506e3517-74c0-4c01-9014-7ac46c04b8ab: url('/single2017/images/quote-texture.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-df9fc827-fcd1-4358-8dfb-647f60029ad2: url('/single2017/images/quote-2021.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-4e5e9d63-50ca-4973-9d45-c8e25ecbb661: url('/single2017/images/quote-texture.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-48c8e83b-ebed-41d1-a684-5e26ee25bc9d: url('/single2017/images/quote-2021.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-ea583872-d72c-4b56-8064-2a345958e2bd: url('/single2017/images/quote-texture.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-6e50805c-e546-4e9c-9448-6487c61c4426: url('/single2017/images/quote-2021.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-7265fb9e-d7ac-4517-8596-024a7b8f5f7d: url('/single2017/images/quote-texture.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-bf64682f-a23d-4d3b-a08a-81aa839232bb: url('/single2017/images/quote-2021.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-b979860a-b278-4551-8a95-8dd6147585a0: url('/single2017/images/quote-texture.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-3a437fb3-7dbf-482e-ad85-ba43a9e04314: url('/single2017/images/quote-2021.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-e603d182-8895-46fb-8fe4-b6af7baeb140: url('/single2017/images/quote-texture.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-7d66c1ed-dde4-4bc2-95e5-9585adc208ba: url('/single2017/images/quote-2021.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-6e721358-0051-469d-a269-8105f6496fb3: url('/single2017/images/quote-texture.png');}.sib-flag{--wpr-bg-6558124e-703c-49e3-be08-f362f0407430: url('https://static.brevo.com/images/flags.png');}.simplePullQuote{--wpr-bg-d8481201-5dc4-436c-9b0a-ac69170bffe0: url('/wp-content/plugins/simple-pull-quote/images/quote.png');}.rll-youtube-player .play{--wpr-bg-00d427ba-d3b1-4553-93b4-5215d109447c: url('/wp-content/plugins/wp-rocket/assets/img/youtube.png');}#inq-banner-2021-FT-survey{--wpr-bg-2b22acb6-6feb-42a3-b2f7-cd2cb31c4b49: url('https://www.inquirer.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/SMDC-HenrySy_980x80.gif');}#inq-banner-2021-FT-survey{--wpr-bg-9b1b6d52-3eff-48a0-941f-e8c463bb8104: url('https://www.inquirer.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/SMDC-HenrySy_980x80.gif');}#inq-banner-2021-FT-survey{--wpr-bg-659ab991-10c7-421e-a08f-62de44d8bb38: url('https://www.inquirer.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/SMDC-HenrySy_980x80.gif');}#inq-banner-2021-FT-survey{--wpr-bg-8ec9bf41-4fff-4c71-afb2-e026546515f5: url('https://www.inquirer.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/SMDC-HenrySy_300x75.gif');}#inq-banner-2021-FT-survey{--wpr-bg-320ae54b-6c76-4edd-88d8-3651a6e69ace: url('https://www.inquirer.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/SMDC-HenrySy_300x75.gif');}#inq-banner-2021-FT-survey{--wpr-bg-784d45c6-ca85-4563-ab58-3a43880e3689: url('https://www.inquirer.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/SMDC-HenrySy_300x75.gif');}#inq-banner-2021-FT-survey{--wpr-bg-6554db06-cbba-4bcf-b09c-0510b4520af1: url('https://www.inquirer.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/SMDC-HenrySy_300x75.gif');}#inqplus-cta-wrap{--wpr-bg-875f267d-82c8-4006-a4a5-6f2d0c3521d9: url('/single2017/images/inqplus-sub/inqplus-cta-bg1.png');}#newsletter-cta-wrap{--wpr-bg-0a2d1b00-23e5-476f-9234-0eae7ce1240e: url('/single2017/images/inqplus-sub/inqplus-cta-bg1.png');}

黑料社

FOLLOW US:

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

DOJ: No retraction of testimony vs De Lima

Philippine Daily Inquirer / 05:06 AM December 05, 2020

MANILA, Philippines — The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Friday asked the Muntinlupa City Regional Trial Court to cite detained Sen. Leila de Lima and her lawyer in contempt of court for claiming that state witnesses had retracted their testimony or testified that there was no evidence of wrongdoing against the senator.

Prosecutor Ramoncito Bienvenido Ocampo Jr. denied that convicted drug lord Vicente Sy retracted his testimony that he gave P500,000 to De Lima and that witnesses from the Anti-Money Laundering Council and the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency testified that they found no evidence against De Lima.

Her lawyers declined to comment on the motion since they have yet to get a copy of the pleading. —MARLON RAMOS

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

READ NEXT

Maria Ressa seeks junking of 2nd cyberlibel complaint

Size-75 boots designed to stamp out COVID-19

EDITORS' PICK

Timely DOH reminder: Keep lungs, heart healthy

340 firecracker 鈥� related injuries logged, so far 鈥� DOH

MOST READ

entertainment

sports

globalnation

newsinfo

Timely DOH reminder: Keep lungs, heart healthy

newsinfo

340 firecracker 鈥� related injuries logged, so far 鈥� DOH

usa

TAGS: court, DoJ, Leila de Lima, opposition, Politics, retraction, witnesses

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

Disclaimer: Comments do not represent the views of 黑料社. We reserve the right to exclude comments which are inconsistent with our editorial standards. FULL DISCLAIMER

© Copyright 1997-2025 黑料社 | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.