(Last of two parts)
MANILA, Philippines 鈥� As soon as Vice President Leni Robredo hit the hustings in her hometown of Naga City in Camarines Sur, bite-sized videos bearing false claims related to the presidential hopeful started circulating on social media.
A short video taken during her proclamation rally on Feb. 8, viewed hundreds of thousands of times on Facebook and on TikTok, a popular entertainment platform among the youth, contained altered audio that made it sound like her audience was chanting 鈥淏BM鈥� in support of her main rival Ferdinand 鈥淏ongbong鈥� Marcos Jr.
In another misleading TikTok video, Robredo was accused of cheating during the CNN Philippines presidential debate because she appeared to be checking notes while answering a question about the West Philippine Sea. In fact, they were notes she had taken during the debate, not 鈥渒odigo鈥� (cheat sheets).
These are the kinds of video content that Hannah Barrantes, a corporate lawyer who does independent fact-checking on TikTok, fears: short, entertaining, and digestible propaganda based on falsehoods that are swiftly shared 鈥渨ithout leaving anything to ponder on.鈥�
With only a handful of legitimate fact-checkers in the media industry, disinformation on the platform has become so widespread that independent fact-checkers like Barrantes and others 鈥� or 鈥淭ruthTokers鈥� as they call themselves 鈥� felt compelled to clean up the platform.
鈥淲hile we aren鈥檛 yet the majority on the platform, it鈥檚 satisfying to see real people pushing back (against disinformation) there,鈥� she said. 鈥淚t also leads to a ripple effect, where former staunch supporters whom we engage (became) enlightened and shift their options.鈥�
Constant battle
TruthTokers are in a constant battle against misinformation and disinformation. Misinformation spreads wrong or misleading information as facts, regardless of whether there is intent to deceive. Disinformation is more insidious as it is the deliberate dissemination of false or fabricated information to mislead or deceive the public or a certain group.
Academics are seeing the potential of 鈥渆merging platforms鈥� like TikTok, one of the top apps downloaded in the country last year, for sowing disinformation.
A study published by in December 2021 on emerging social media platforms observed 鈥渕isinformation and disinformation on TikTok videos, particularly on COVID-19 and the upcoming 2022 Philippine general elections, with fairly huge engagements, although it is difficult to discern how extensive the reach of such content is.鈥�
Engagement
Internews is an international nonprofit organization that supports civil society groups and local media in promoting trustworthy, high-quality news and information.
On larger platforms like Facebook and YouTube, influencers and online celebrities often dictate the narrative, including false claims and propaganda.
But in TikTok, users and influencers or content creators use what is viral, whether it鈥檚 a trending sound, filter, dance choreography or hashtag, according to Samuel Cabbuag, assistant professor in sociology at the University of the Philippines and one of the authors of the Internews study.
鈥淭his is how they manage to be more visible in the app, and thus get more views, engagement and followers,鈥� Cabbuag said.
Engagement is a measure of the number of views, shares, and comments that a TikTok post has generated.
The Internews study noted that false or misleading content on this platform were 鈥渃reated, or engaged with by both anonymous and identified accounts,鈥� indicating that the form of disinformation here 鈥渋s more organic and authentic relative to other platforms.鈥�
Barrantes said she makes TikTok videos to explain how laws are interpreted.
Some of the content she had seen in similar videos were 鈥渏ust pure propaganda, with 鈥榩seudo-intellectuals鈥� using legal terms interpreted in a wrong way.鈥�
She encountered TikTokers who claimed that the only law which branded the Marcoses鈥� enormous wealth as ill-gotten was the late President Corazon Aquino鈥檚 Executive Order No. 1, which created the Presidential Commission on Good Government to recover an estimated $10 billion of the family鈥檚 ill-gotten wealth.
鈥楬ow sick was that?鈥�
鈥淭hey argued that if EO1 was not drafted by [Aquino], then the Marcoses鈥� wealth is not ill-gotten. How sick was that?鈥� Barrantes said. 鈥淲e have Supreme Court cases that recognized the Marcoses鈥� ill-gotten wealth.鈥�
But aside from attempting to question established facts and whitewash history, the videos that Barrantes encountered were also direct attacks against Robredo, who beat the ousted dictator鈥檚 son in the 2016 vice presidential polls.
This is consistent with the preliminary findings of , an academe-based fact-checking group. It said that Robredo had been the 鈥渂iggest victim鈥� of disinformation, while Marcos was its main beneficiary.
As one of the self-organized TruthTokers, Barrantes engages troll armies head-on with counter-disinformation videos. She eventually volunteered to disprove false law-related claims against Robredo.
There are now many video creators trying to push back against disinformation, she said.
鈥淏ut we鈥檙e still powerless against groups who have the machinery to churn out more and more untruths,鈥� said Barrantes.
Open letters
She considers the TikTok algorithm a blackhole, where watching one false video would lead a person to more similar content until the platform traps users in an echo chamber.
鈥淲e are also aware 鈥� and afraid 鈥� that in fighting disinformation on TikTok, there鈥檚 a tendency for us to be trapped in our own echo chambers. The task is to bring more people to the 鈥榯ruth algorithm,鈥欌€� she said.
In December last year, the Movement Against Disinformation (MAD), a nonpartisan network of individuals and groups, wrote open letters to TikTok, Google and YouTube urging them to be transparent, accountable and proactive in countering false information.
MAD specifically asked TikTok to replicate measures it put in place for the 2020 elections in the United States when it removed false or manipulated videos or had tagged them as 鈥渘ot eligible for recommendation.鈥�
In response, TikTok Philippines public policy head Kristoffer Rada vowed that it was committed to fight online disinformation. It said it was already implementing several of MAD鈥檚 suggestions, and promised to 鈥渃ontinue to do so until the end of the 2022 elections.鈥�
But MAD convener Tony La Vi帽a said that while the platform鈥檚 policies were good, the problem with TikTok was in its 鈥渃onsistency鈥� in implementing those policies and in the lack of 鈥減romptness鈥� in responding to complaints and in immediately taking down false claims.
鈥淎nd each day that a piece of fake news stays on TikTok, [you] can imagine how it鈥檚 played again and again,鈥� he said.
There is a need for the platform to do more content moderation and to act more decisively in rooting out disinformation, he said.
Accountability
Celine Samson, head of the online verification team of Vera Files in its partnership with Tsek.ph, said that it was important for social media giants to be accountable for disinformation 鈥渂ecause it is through these platforms that these narratives are circulated.鈥�
鈥淲e鈥檝e seen many of these platforms 鈥� Meta, YouTube, Google 鈥� have stringent policies relating to COVID-19 and vaccination, but unfortunately the same cannot be said on historical revisionism and disinformation,鈥� Samson said.
According to La Vi帽a, it is important to consider that although TikTok does not have as many users as Facebook, they are mostly young people 鈥� a huge component of registered voters in the elections.
Aside from this demographic, La Vi帽a said the nature of the medium-short, shareable videos can do immense harm on the youth.
鈥淭he medium is the message, and the medium dictates also the message,鈥� he said. 鈥淭o some extent, it limits the kind of content you can put on TikTok, but it can be much more effective, and you can reach more people.鈥�
In an email to the Inquirer on Wednesday, TikTok Philippines lead for communications Conrad Bateman said TikTok was 鈥渃ommitted to providing access to trustworthy and relevant information for our Philippine community, particularly over the course of the 2022 elections.鈥�
With the support of the Commission on Elections, Bateman said that TikTok Philippines launched an in-app election guide that encouraged its users to vote and provided 鈥渁uthoritative information鈥� on the election process.
In responding to reports of misleading content, Bateman said that TikTok 鈥渨ill intervene to restrict the spread of misleading posts, using prompts when a user attempts to share a video, with a warning reminding them that the content has been flagged as unverified.鈥�
* * *
Editor鈥檚 Note: This report was produced with support from Internews Philippines.
RELATED STORIES
TikTok as poll battlefield: Lies spreading unchecked
Robredo is biggest disinformation victim; Marcos gains from 鈥榤isleading鈥� posts 鈥� fact-checker
Robredo: Disinformation, fake news still biggest challenge to presidential bid