Abortions can resume in Texas after judge blocks pre-Roe v. Wade ban

By: 3 years ago

Abortions can resume in Texas after a judge on Tuesday blocked officials from enforcing a nearly century-old ban the state鈥檚 Republican attorney general said was back in effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to the procedure nationwide.

The temporary restraining order by Judge Christine Weems in Harris County came in a last-ditch bid by abortion providers to resume services after the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that guaranteed the right of women to obtain abortions.

The order allows clinics to resume services, for now, in a state where abortion was already severely restricted to only up to six weeks of pregnancy under a Texas law that took effect in September that the U.S. Supreme Court declined to block.

鈥淓very hour that abortion is accessible in Texas is a victory,鈥� Marc Hearron, a lawyer for the abortion providers at Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement.

Abortion rights protesters participate in nationwide demonstrations following the leaked Supreme Court opinion suggesting the possibility of overturning the Roe v. Wade abortion rights decision, in Houston, Texas, U.S., May 14, 2022. REUTERS

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Twitter said he was immediately appealing the judge鈥檚鈥渨rong鈥� decision, saying the pre-Roe laws 鈥渁re 100% in effect & constitutional.鈥� A further hearing is scheduled for July 12.

The decision came amid a flurry of litigation in state courts by abortion rights groups seeking to slow or halt restrictions on the ability of women to terminate pregnancies that are now taking effect or are poised to do so in 22 states.

Those states include 13 that like Texas enacted so-called 鈥渢rigger鈥� laws designed to take effect if Roe v. Wade was overturned, according to the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion rights advocacy research group.

Following the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision, federal courts have been lifting orders blocking Republican-backed abortion restrictions. On Tuesday, a federal appeals court cleared the way for a six-week ban in Tennessee to take effect.

Paxton, in an advisory issued after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, said the state鈥檚 2021 trigger ban, which bars abortions almost entirely, would not take immediate effect. Providers say that could take two months or more.

But Paxton said prosecutors could choose to immediately pursue criminal charges against abortion providers based on a different, old statute that had gone unenforced while Roe v. Wade was on the books but that remained Texas law.

Texas abortion providers in a lawsuit filed on Monday argued the 1925 ban had been repealed and conflicted with the more recent trigger ban the Republican-dominated legislature passed.

The lawsuit was filed the same day that judges in Louisiana and Utah blocked officials from enforcing their states鈥� 鈥渢rigger鈥� bans, and abortion providers in Idaho, Kentucky and Mississippi sued to obtain similar relief.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court in a 8-1 decision on Monday rejected a request by providers to block implementation of a near-total ban on abortions that took effect in May, before the U.S. Supreme Court鈥檚 ruling but after a draft version leaked.

In Iowa, where the state鈥檚 top court ruled the Iowa constitution does not include a 鈥渇undamental right鈥� to abortion, Republican Governor Kim Reynolds on Tuesday said she will ask a court to reinstate a previously struck down 鈥渇etal heartbeat鈥� law banning abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy.

黑料社