An artist鈥檚 rendition of the P734-billion New Manila International Airport that will rise in Bulakan, Bulacan. (SAN MIGUEL CORP.)
MANILA, Philippines 鈥� It鈥檚 not the end of the road for the vetoed bill granting tax perks to a proposed special economic zone adjacent to the P740-billion New Manila International Airport being developed in Bulacan province as its proponents may refile the measure with changes addressing President Marcos鈥� concerns, senators said on Sunday.
Press Secretary Trixie Cruz Angeles also said on Sunday that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. fully supported the creation of the Bulacan Airport City Special Economic Zone and Freeport and his decision to veto House Bill No. 7575 creating it was meant to 鈥渃ure the defects鈥� found in the measure.
In a statement, Angeles said that had the President not vetoed HB 7575, it would have lapsed into law on Monday, or 30 days after the bill was sent by Congress to Malaca帽ang.
鈥淧residential veto is the fastest way to cure the defects of HB 7575, especially the provision which exempts the Commission on Audit to look into the financial transactions on the special economic zone and freeport,鈥� she said.
Sen. Juan Edgardo Angara, chair of the Senate finance committee, said there was still hope for the proposed Bulacan ecozone in the 19th Congress despite its surprise rejection by Marcos in one of his first acts in office.
鈥淚鈥檓 sure the bill will be refiled by the author/s perhaps with some amendments as a result of the veto message,鈥� the senator told the Inquirer on Viber.
鈥淚t won鈥檛 be the first time for a bill to take this path after being vetoed,鈥� Angara said.
Sen. Aquilino Pimentel III, in a message to the Inquirer, also raised such a possibility with the caveat that 鈥渋t should be fully discussed.鈥�
Sen. Joel Villanueva, who will lead the Senate majority in the new Congress, said he recognized Marcos鈥� prerogative to reject the bill but admitted he was disappointed 鈥渁s the proposal has the potential to create a lot of jobs for Filipinos.鈥�
鈥淲e will carefully study refiling this bill, and even consider other possible proposals such as strengthening the Peza (Philippine Economic Zone Authority) law,鈥� he said.
Options
In the House of Representatives, Albay Rep. Joey Salceda asked Congress to consider crafting a new measure in lieu of the vetoed bill that would address the President鈥檚 concerns.
In a communication to Speaker Martin Romualdez, Salceda said Congress has two options on the veto: Override or reevaluate and revise or simply abandon the bill 鈥渢aking the President鈥檚 concerns as serious infirmities.鈥�
The Albay lawmaker proposed that the new bill explicitly state that the ecozone would be fully subject to the rules, procedures, and regulations of the Corporate Recovery and Tax Incentives for Enterprises (CREATE) Act and explicitly provide that the power of the ecozone to grant incentives would be a delegated power from the Fiscal Incentives Review Board.
He added that the powers and functions of the Bulacan Airport City Special Economic Zone and Freeport Authority take standard powers and functions granted to other investment promotion agencies such as Peza.
The vetoed measure originated from the Lower House as House Bill No. 7575 and was sponsored in the Senate by Marcos鈥� sister, Sen. Imee Marcos, as the chair of the Senate economic affairs committee.
In a statement on Sunday, Sen. Imee Marcos said her younger brother鈥檚 veto of the bill she defended on the Senate floor 鈥渉ighlights the independence of the executive and legislative branches of government, which bodes well for a thorough treatment of national concerns under the Marcos administration.鈥�
鈥淭rabaho lang, walang personalan at wala ring kapatiran (It鈥檚 just work, don鈥檛 take it personally and no sibling ties here),鈥� she said.
Threat to fishermen
She said the Senate had hoped that the new Bulacan ecozone would generate jobs and income for communities still experiencing economic distress due to the pandemic.
The House passed the bill on Sept. 15, 2020, and the Senate followed suit on May 31 this year. On June 1, the House adopted the Senate鈥檚 amendments to the bill, forgoing a bicameral conference to reconcile differences between their versions.
The Bulacan project is being developed by , one of the country鈥檚 biggest conglomerates controlled by billionaire Ramon S. Ang.
The vetoed bill would have granted incentives to locators that invest and set up shop in the ecozone, the airport, the airport city adjacent to it and the adjoining lands later.
Meanwhile, a fisherfolk group on Sunday welcomed the President鈥檚 vetoing the bill creating the ecozone, but added that it 鈥渨ould only be laudable鈥� if he repealed the entire project that allegedly threatened their livelihood.
鈥淭his will be laudable only if the San Miguel Aerotropolis project will be completely off from any negotiations. And until the displaced fisherfolk and coastal residents are able to return to their community which has been the target of the project,鈥� said Bobby Roldan, national chair for Luzon of Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya).
鈥擶ITH REPORTS FROM JEANNETTE I. ANDRADE AND KRIXIA SUBINGSUBING聽
RELATED STORIES
First veto: Bongbong Marcos nixes Bulacan freeport bill
PCOO: Bulacan Airport City ecozone bill veto 鈥榤eant to cure defects in measure 鈥�
Veto of bill creating Bulacan Airport City ecozone 鈥榰nfortunate鈥� 鈥� Zubiri, Villanueva