Economic managers insist on MIF, say it’s needed | Inquirer

FOR SIGNING INTO LAW

Economic managers insist on MIF, say it’s needed

/ 04:45 AM June 14, 2023

Budget Secretary Amenah Pangandaman STORY: Economic managers insist on MIF, say it’s needed

Budget Secretary Amenah Pangandaman (File photo by RYAN LEAGOGO / )

MANILA, Philippines — The Marcos administration’s economic team on Tuesday redoubled their push for the proposed law that creates the Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF), saying the MIF was not only advantageous but needed.

The government’s team of economic managers on Monday issued an eight-page statement defending the MIF bill after economists at the University of the Philippines (UP) called on their current and former colleagues in the administration to reconsider their position in pushing for an MIF that has “confused goals” and is “defective and poses a serious threat to the country’s economy.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Meanwhile, Budget Secretary Amenah Pangandaman told reporters that the MIF bill, which breezed through Congress, has not yet been transmitted to the Office of the President.

FEATURED STORIES

Finance officials earlier said President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. was expected to sign the bill into law before Congress starts a new session in July.

When asked whether the MIF bill was discussed during the Cabinet meeting held on June 13, Pangandaman said: “Not yet. It was not part of the agenda.”

Article continues after this advertisement

In their statement, the economic managers reaffirmed their support for the establishment of the MIF as a vehicle for economic growth.

Article continues after this advertisement

They said that the MIF was aligned with the Medium-Term Fiscal Framework (MTFF) and brings into action the Philippine Development Plan (PDP) 2023 to 2028.

Article continues after this advertisement

MIF objectives clear

The UP professors and lecturers, in a 27-page discussion paper published by the School of Economics, said the MIF “has amorphous developmental goals and speaks of development only in the broadest possible terms.”

The MIF was not anchored to the MTFF and “does not even make any reference” to the PDP, the academics said.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the economic team said the MIF fits into one of the strategies laid out through the PDP—to “diversify and explore alternative sources of financing … [And] new instrument formats will also be explored to reach new markets and investors.”

Finance Secretary Benjamin Diokno, who chairs the executive department’s Economic Development Group, is a professor emeritus at the UP School of Economics (UPSE).

Pangandaman is an alumna while Secretary Arsenio Balisacan of the joined the UPSE faculty in 1998 and served as dean from 2010 to 2012.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

The economic team added that the objective of the MIF was clear, which was to invest funds that are available in government agencies and use them for investment purposes on the basis of their individual mandates.

RELATED STORIES

Pimentel wants Maharlika bill back in Congress to fix ‘glaring errors, discrepancies’

SSS, GSIS may still invest in MIF projects – Dela Rosa

Sen. Mark Villar: 97 high-impact projects can be financed through Maharlika Investment Fund

usa
business
globalnation
sports
business
www
www
business
sports
globalnation
TAGS: Amenah Pangandaman, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Maharlika Investment Fund, Marcos economic managers

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

© Copyright 1997-2024 | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.