Peter Navarro, a White House economic adviser under former U.S. President Donald Trump, speaks to reporters outside the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse in Washington, U.S., September 5, 2023. (REUTERS)
WASHINGTON 鈥� Former U.S. President Donald Trump鈥檚 trade adviser Peter Navarro was found guilty on Thursday of contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena from the House of Representatives committee that investigated the 2021 attack on the Capitol.
A 12-member jury found Navarro guilty of two counts of contempt after he refused to testify or turn over documents to the Democratic-led House panel that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021 riot by Trump supporters and broader attempts by Trump, a Republican, to reverse his 2020 election defeat.
鈥淭he defendant choose allegiance to former President Trump over compliance with the subpoena,鈥� federal prosecutor Elizabeth Aloi told the jurors during closing arguments on Thursday. 鈥淭hat is contempt. That is a crime.鈥�
The charges carry a minimum of 30 days and a maximum of one year in jail. A sentencing hearing was scheduled for Jan. 12, 2024.
Navarro is a hawk on China policy who advised Trump on trade issues during his presidency and also served on the COVID-19 task force.
Navarro became the second close associate of Trump to be convicted for spurning the committee after Steve Bannon was found guilty last year of contempt of Congress for similarly defying a subpoena and was sentenced to four months in prison. Bannon is now appealing the conviction.
The verdict in Navarro鈥檚 case in federal court in Washington came after a trial that featured just one day of testimony from three prosecution witnesses, former staff members of the select committee. The defense did not call any witnesses or present any evidence.
Navarro said ahead of trial that he did not have to comply with the committee鈥檚 demand because Trump invoked executive privilege, a legal doctrine that shields some executive branch records and communications from disclosure.
But U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Navarro could not use this as a defense, finding that the defendant had not put forward evidence that Trump formally invoked executive privilege in response to the subpoena. Defense lawyer Stanley Woodward was left to argue that Navarro鈥檚 failure to comply may have been an accident or a mistake.
The verdict represented a victory for the Justice Department and the now-defunct select committee, which moved aggressively to secure testimony from many of Trump鈥檚 top advisers before being disbanded when Republicans took control of the House in January.
Many of the committee鈥檚 findings were mirrored in a federal criminal indictment obtained by Special Counsel Jack Smith accusing Trump of attempting to subvert the election results, one of four criminal cases he faces as he runs to regain the presidency in 2024.
The panel sought to interview Navarro about a plan devised by him and other Trump allies, dubbed the 鈥淕reen Bay Sweep,鈥� to delay Congress from certifying Democratic President Joe Biden鈥檚 2020 election victory. The committee concluded its work last year without interviewing Navarro.
Navarro had said publicly that he was protecting the presidency by not sharing information with Congress.
Trump supporters stormed the Capitol on the day that Congress met to certify Biden鈥檚 victory, attacking police and sending lawmakers and others fleeing for safety. Trump has made false claims that the election was stolen from him through widespread voting fraud.