Militant activists and other progressive groups troop at Camp Crame in Quezon City on Friday, Dec. 11, 2020, to protest the arrest of 7 activists during the celebration of Human Rights Day and slam the red tagging by the government of progressive groups. (File photo by GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE / Philippine DailyInquirer)
MANILA, Philippines 鈥� Ahead of the country鈥檚 implementation of its controversial antiterror law starting Jan. 15, the international human rights organization Human Rights Watch (HRW) has called for an end to the Philippine government鈥檚 鈥減ernicious鈥� practice of red-tagging leftist activists and critics who are at 鈥渟erious risk.鈥�
In its annual World Report 2024, which surveys human rights practices in more than 100 countries, HRW observed how the Marcos administration has 鈥渋ncreasingly constricted democratic space by using the justice system to target leftist activist groups.鈥�
While the group took note of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.鈥檚 鈥渕easured rhetoric鈥� about human rights, it said that many of the abuses reported under his predecessor, former President Rodrigo Duterte, remained rampant.
HRW also pointed out that there seemed to be no 鈥渆vident efforts to end the practice鈥� despite Marcos鈥� promise to improve the country鈥檚 human rights situation.
The group specifically expressed concern over Red-tagging, which recently has turned into 鈥渢errorist-tagging,鈥� as the government wields its 鈥渉arsh and overbroad鈥� Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 (Republic Act No. 11479) to target civil society organizations.
Abductions
It cited the humanitarian group Community Empowerment Resource Network, which, after being Red-tagged by the military, was charged with providing funds to the New People鈥檚 Army (NPA).
This practice appears to have paved the way for another phenomenon: the abductions of and subsequent 鈥渟urrender鈥� of activists, HRW said. It pointed to the abduction of Cebu-based activists Dyan Gumanao and Armand Dayoha at a port in Cebu City, who later surfaced to accuse state agents of kidnapping them.
Last September, environmental activists Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano also went missing and were later presented to the media by state forces who claimed they were NPA fighters.
But in a separate state-organized press conference, the two belied the claim against them and accused the military of abducting them.
Case against Duterte
Given these circumstances, HRW Deputy Asia director Bryony Lau urged the Marcos administration to 鈥渆nd the pernicious practice of labeling government opponents as communists.鈥�
鈥淩ed-tagging is a form of harassment that can lead to deadly abuses, and runs counter to Marcos鈥� pledge to promote human rights,鈥� he said.
One such example that underscored how this practice could lead to other violations is the case of ACT Teachers Rep. France Castro, who has not only borne the brunt of the government鈥檚 Red-tagging but is also consistently branded as an NPA sympathizer.
On Jan. 9, the Quezon City Prosecutor鈥檚 Office dismissed her criminal complaint of grave threats against Duterte, citing lack of sufficient evidence.
The decision angered local rights groups, who questioned how the prosecutor could claim that Duterte 鈥渨as not serious in hurling death threats.鈥�
From its records, Karapatan said that at least 422 activists were killed during his six-year term, and another 574 survived attempts on their lives simply because of 鈥淒uterte鈥檚 explicit kill orders through public statements in front of soldiers and police.鈥�
鈥淭he number of Duterte鈥檚 victims is no joke. It is never a laughing matter to be threatened by a brutal fascist with a murderous history like Duterte. The Quezon City prosecutor must reconsider the decision and indict Duterte for the grave threats he said against Representative Castro,鈥� Karapatan said.