WASHINGTON 鈥 A digital tool considered vital in tracking viral falsehoods, CrowdTangle will be decommissioned by Facebook owner Meta in a major election year, a move researchers fear will disrupt efforts to detect an expected firehose of political misinformation.
The tech giant says CrowdTangle will be unavailable after Aug. 14, less than three months before the US election. The Palo Alto company plans to replace it with a new tool that researchers say lacks the same functionality, and which news organizations will largely not have access to.
For years, CrowdTangle has been a game changer, offering researchers and journalists crucial real-time transparency into the spread of conspiracy theories and hate speech on influential Meta-owned platforms, including Facebook and Instagram.
READ: Meta purge: 6M Instagram, FB posts removed during PH election season
Killing off the monitoring tool, a move experts say is in line with a tech industry trend of rolling back transparency and security measures, is a major blow as dozens of countries hold elections this year鈥攁 period when bad actors typically spread false narratives more than ever.
鈥淚n a year where almost half of the global population is expected to vote in elections, cutting off access to CrowdTangle will severely limit independent oversight of harms,鈥 Melanie Smith, director of research at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, told Agence France-Presse (AFP).
鈥楪rave step backwards鈥
鈥淚t represents a grave step backwards for social media platform transparency.鈥
Meta is set to replace CrowdTangle with a new Content Library, a technology still under development.
READ:
It鈥檚 a tool that some in the tech industry, including former CrowdTangle chief executive Brandon Silverman, said is currently not an effective replacement, especially in elections likely to see a proliferation of AI-enabled falsehoods.
鈥淚t鈥檚 an entire new muscle鈥 that Meta is yet to build to protect the integrity of elections, Silverman told AFP, calling for 鈥渙penness and transparency.鈥
鈥楧irect threat鈥
In recent election cycles, researchers say CrowdTangle alerted them to harmful activities including foreign interference, online harassment and incitements to violence.
By its own admission, Meta鈥攚hich bought CrowdTangle in 2016鈥攕aid that in 2019 elections in Louisiana, the tool helped state officials identify misinformation, such as inaccurate poll hours that had been posted online.
In the 2020 presidential vote, the company offered the tool to US election officials across all states to help them 鈥渜uickly identify misinformation, voter interference and suppression.鈥
The tool also made dashboards available to the public to track what major candidates were posting on their official and campaign pages.
Lamenting the risk of losing these functions forever, global nonprofit Mozilla Foundation demanded in an open letter to Meta that CrowdTangle be retained at least until January 2025.
鈥淎bandoning CrowdTangle while the Content Library lacks so much of CrowdTangle鈥檚 core functionality undermines the fundamental principle of transparency,鈥 said the letter signed by dozens of tech watchdogs and researchers.
The new tool lacks CrowdTangle features including robust search flexibility and decommissioning it would be a 鈥渄irect threat鈥 to the integrity of elections, it added.
Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said the letter鈥檚 claims are 鈥渏ust wrong,鈥 insisting the Content Library will contain 鈥渕ore comprehensive data than CrowdTangle鈥 and be made available to academics and nonprofit election integrity experts.
鈥楲ot of concerns鈥
Meta, which has been moving away from news across its platforms, will not make the new tool accessible to for-profit media.
Journalists have used CrowdTangle in the past to investigate public health crises as well as human rights abuses and natural disasters.
Meta鈥檚 decision to cut off journalists comes after many used CrowdTangle to report unflattering stories, including its flailing moderation efforts and how its gaming app was overrun with pirated content.
CrowdTangle has been a crucial source of data that helped 鈥渉old Meta accountable for enforcing its policies,鈥 Tim Harper, a senior policy analyst at the Center for Democracy & Technology, told AFP.
Organizations that debunk misinformation as part of Meta鈥檚 third-party fact-checking program, including AFP, will have access to the Content Library.
But other researchers and nonprofits will have to apply for access or look for expensive alternatives. 鈥擜贵笔