SC: Remitting GSIS contributions not part of mayors' job

SC: Remitting GSIS contributions not part of mayors’ job

By: - Reporter /
/ 03:31 PM October 31, 2024

SC: Remitting GSIS contributions not part of mayors' job

The Supreme Court of the Philippines. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that remitting contributions to the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) is not part of the mayor’s job.

The ruling was in a decision penned by Associate Justice Samuel Gaerlan in acquitting Sto. Tomas, Isabela Mayor Antonio Talaue of violating Republic Act (RA) 8291 or the GSIS Act of 1997.

Article continues after this advertisement

The SC cited RA 7160, or the Local Government Code, which states that municipal mayors are considered “chief executives” and not the “heads of offices” mandated by section 52(g) of the GSIS Act of 1997 to remit GSIS contributions.

FEATURED STORIES

“The Local Government Code does not include remitting GSIS contributions among a mayor’s listed duties,” the decision read.

“Furthermore, no internal directive or issuance was cited to demonstrate the mayor’s involvement in the remittance of GSIS contributions,” it added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The GSIS accused Talaue of failing to remit the social contributions of the local government’s employees between 1997 and 2003, amounting to P12,071,451.22 in 2003.

Article continues after this advertisement

Following a complaint filed by the GSIS, the Office of the Ombudsman charged Talaue with violating Section 52(g) of the GSIS Act of 1997. The Sandiganbayan found Talaue guilty.

Article continues after this advertisement

Talaue appealed the Sandiganbayan’s decision to the SC in 2021 but it was denied.

This time, the SC granted Talaue’s motion for reconsideration.

Article continues after this advertisement

Apart from citing the Local Government Code which states that remitting GSIS contributions is not within the duties of local chief executives, the SC also ruled that the prosecution “failed to establish that Talaue was responsible for remitting employees’ GSIS premium contributions or that he intended to violate the GSIS Act of 1997.”

“The prosecution also failed to prove that Talaue intended to withhold the remittance of contributions,” it added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

READ: SC voids GSIS resolutions

MOST READ
www
www
entertainment
entertainment
entertainment
TAGS: GSIS, SC

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

© Copyright 1997-2024 | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.