Antigraft court junks plea on P10 million pork barrel case

‘Contributory negligence’

Antigraft court junks plea on P10 million pork barrel case

By: - Reporter /
/ 05:42 AM February 15, 2025

Antigraft court junks plea on P10-M pork barrel case

Sandiganbayan–INQUIRER file photo

The Sandiganbayan has rejected the appeal made by a former staff of the late Negros Oriental Rep. Herminio Teves to overturn her conviction over the irregular transfer of P10 million from the lawmaker’s pork barrel funds to a nongovernmental organization for agricultural projects.

In a resolution on Feb. 11, the antigraft court’s Third Division denied for “lack of merit” the motion for reconsideration filed by Hiram Pulido, a former chief of staff of Teves, who was convicted of graft and malversation in 2023.

Article continues after this advertisement

Pulido was found guilty of conspiring and allowing Teves’ Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) in 2007 to be misappropriated by Molugan Foundation Inc. (MFI), which was identified as the project partner of what turned out to be a ghost project.

FEATURED STORIES

In her pleading filed in October last year, Pulido asserted that she “has no knowledge of or dealings with [MFI] or any person connected therewith and is unfamiliar with her co-accused.”

She also denied having seen the project proposal and stressed that her signatures above the name of Teves in documents were “fake and forged” as she was no longer working for the lawmaker at the time.

Article continues after this advertisement

Regarding her late filing of her motion, Pulido blamed her previous lawyer who she said became “negligent” on her case and eventually “abandoned” her.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the antigraft court ruled that Pulido was “bound by the failure of [her lawyer] to timely file the necessary pleading.”

Article continues after this advertisement

It added, “This court finds that Pulido is also guilty of contributory negligence for losing her right to appeal. She did not exercise due diligence in monitoring the status of her cases.”

The court said it was also “not persuaded” by the former chief of staff’s argument that she was unable to personally follow up her cases at the Sandiganbayan because “she could have simply resorted to other means of communication.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Pulido, along with Belina Concepcion, Dennis Cunanan and Marivic Jover of defunct Technology Resource Center; and Samuel Bombeo of MFI, were found liable for violating Sec. 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019, or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, as well as malversation under the Revised Penal Code.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

TAGS: pork barrel scam, Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

© Copyright 1997-2025 | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.