SC asks Palace, legislators to submit 2025 budget bills

High court sets talking points on petition filed by Duterte allies

SC asks Palace, legislators to submit 2025 budget bills

By: - Reporter /
/ 05:38 AM February 21, 2025

SC asks Palace, legislators to submit 2025 budget bills

PHOTO: National Privacy Commision website / privacy.gov.ph

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court has ordered the House of Representatives, the Senate, and Malacañang to submit the original copies of the 2025 general appropriations bill (GAB) and the 2025 general appropriations enrolled bill ahead of the preliminary conference for a petition alleging “irregularities” in the national budget.

In an advisory dated Feb. 18, the high court directed that the documents be submitted in person no later than noon on Feb. 24, four days before the preliminary conference on Feb. 28.

Article continues after this advertisement

‘Unconstitutional’

The Supreme Court outlined the key issues to be tackled in the April 1 oral arguments for General Register No. 277975, filed by allies of former President Rodrigo Duterte against the House, represented by Speaker Martin Romualdez; the Senate, represented by Senate President Francis Escudero; and Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin.

FEATURED STORIES

In their petition for certiorari and prohibition, former Executive Secretary Victor Rodriguez, Davao City Rep. Isidro Ungab, and other petitioners claimed that the bicameral conference committee submitted a report containing blank items on the GAB, allegedly violating the 1987 Constitution.

They asked the high tribunal to declare Republic Act No. 12116, or the General Appropriations Act (GAA) of 2025, “unconstitutional.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The GAB is the proposed law detailing the government’s budget and allocations for agencies, programs, and projects. The bicameral report is the reconciled version of the budget bills from the House and Senate. Once signed by the President, the GAB becomes the GAA.

Article continues after this advertisement

Meanwhile, the “enrolled bill” that the high court is requesting is the final version of the bill after both houses of Congress have given their final approval. It is printed and certified as correct by the secretary of the Senate and the secretary general of the House, then signed by the Speaker and the Senate President.

Article continues after this advertisement

Discussion points

The key issues to be addressed during the upcoming oral arguments in Baguio City include:

• Whether the 2025 GAA violated the Constitution and the Universal Health Care Act by allocating zero funds to PhilHealth.

Article continues after this advertisement

• Whether it breached the Constitution by increasing Congress’ budget beyond what was proposed in the National Expenditure Program recommended by the President.

• Whether the 2025 GAA violated Section 5(5), Article XIV of the Constitution by allegedly failing to prioritize education in the budget, and

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

• Whether the 2025 GAA was unconstitutional due to the bicameral committee allegedly submitting a report with blank items.

EDITORS' PICK
www
business
globalnation
www
usa
usa
TAGS: budget bill, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

© Copyright 1997-2025 | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.