黑料社

Congress allowed Malaca帽ang to usurp its powers like a 鈥渨illing rape victim,鈥� former Sen. Joker Arroyo said Friday.

Instead of protesting, the Senate and the House of Representatives hired a constitutional law expert to defend President Benigno Aquino III鈥檚 Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) in the Supreme Court, Arroyo said, referring to President Aquino鈥檚 economic stimulus plan that the high tribunal struck down on Tuesday.

Created by Budget Secretary Florencio Abad through National Budget Circular No. 541 in 2012, the DAP pooled the savings of government agencies and channeled the funds to infrastructure projects, a strategy aimed at boosting the economy through faster government spending.

Its legality was challenged in the Supreme Court last year and on Tuesday the high tribunal ruled against Malaca帽ang for usurping Congress鈥� power of the purse and violating the constitutional separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches.

鈥淒id the President usurp Congress鈥� powers? Definitely. But Congress did not complain, just like a willing rape victim,鈥� Arroyo said in a telephone interview.

鈥楿nbridled incursion鈥�

When they were impleaded in the DAP cases, the Senate and the House could have protested the 鈥渦nbridled incursion鈥� into their constitutionally protected power of the purse, and aligned [themselves] with the petitioners, Arroyo said.

At the least, the two chambers could have played a 鈥減assive role鈥� and kept quiet, he said.

鈥淏ut no, Congress retained a high-caliber constitutional law professor to defend the President鈥檚 DAP. With that, Congress surrendered its constitutional power and duty to the executive,鈥� he said.

Saved from its 鈥榦wn folly鈥�

In the end, it was the Supreme Court that saved Congress from its 鈥渙wn folly,鈥� Arroyo added.

Retired Supreme Court Justice Vicente Mendoza represented Congress in the DAP case.

He failed to convince the Supreme Court that the stimulus program was legal.

In separate concurring opinions, the justices said the President usurped Congress鈥� power of the purse, and that Abad 鈥渕ay have knowingly鈥� created an unconstitutional program.

Associate Justice Antonio Carpio argued that President Aquino, while implementing the DAP and NBC 541 in 2012, disregarded specific appropriations in the budget law.

Mr. Aquino, he added, treated the budget as his 鈥渟elf-created all-purpose fund, which the President can spend as he chooses without regard [for] the specific purposes for which the appropriations are made in the [General Appropriations Act].鈥�

Bedding the invader

Arroyo likened the Senate鈥檚 acquiescence to Malaca帽ang in the DAP to a victim of invasion siding with the invader.

鈥淭hey were invaded, their powers were encroached [upon], and their neighbors complained. But they sided with the invaders,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hey went to bed with the invaders.鈥�

Arroyo said Congress had the duty to recover the power of the purse, but it took the Supreme Court to restore the power to the legislature.

鈥淣o sweat from Congress,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hey lost the territory; they didn鈥檛 try to recover it.鈥�

Arroyo said the Supreme Court ruling showed that the President 鈥渃rushed鈥� Congress, but added: 鈥淏ut at what price? His survival is now in peril.鈥�

Earlier, Arroyo said he was not in favor of impeaching the President because this would be a divisive move.

RELATED STORIES

Aquino should not be impeached on DAP issue, says Palace

Aquino, DAP implementers should be held liable for DAP, says lawyer

Bayan bares DAP documents, says Aquino 鈥榗annot invoke good faith鈥�