The Court of Appeals (CA) has affirmed its April 2016 decision dismissing the bid for protection of former Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) minister Lowell Menorca and his family.
In a three-page resolution made public Tuesday, the appeals court 7th Division听 said petitioners Anthony, Lowell鈥檚 brother, and sister-in-law Jungko Otsuka failed to raise new issues in their motion for reconsideration that would warrant a reversal of their April ruling.
鈥淎fter due consideration, it has become manifestly clear that petitioners鈥 arguments are mere reiterations of points and issues which were discussed and addressed in the Resolution sought to be reconsidered and since no new matter and argument had been raised, we find no cogent reason to justify the modification, amendment or reversal of our ruling,鈥 said the appeals court, through Associate Justice Victoria Isabel A. Paredes.
The appeals court explained that it will not determine questions that have already become moot and academic 鈥渂ecause there is no longer any justiciable controversy to speak of.鈥
鈥淭he judgment will not serve any useful purpose or have any practical legal effect because, in the nature of things, it cannot be enforced,鈥 the appeals court added.
The petition was filed on October last year after Menorca and his family were taken and allegedly detained by INC after he was suspected of being Antonio Ebanghelista, the blogger who has been writing against INC.
The INC sought the dismissal of the petition pointing out that the Menorca family is already out of the CA鈥檚 jurisdiction.
Menorca and his family left for Vietnam last March after they received a threat to the life of their two-year-old daughter鈥攁 family photo with the face of their daughter marked with an 鈥淴鈥 inserted in their vehicles鈥 windshield.
READ: Ex-INC Menorca flees to Vietnam, cites death threat
The appeals court, in its April 2016 decision, said the departure of Menorca and his family was the 鈥渟upervening event鈥 that rendered the case moot and academic.
READ: Moot and academic: CA junks Menorca鈥檚 bid for protection
鈥淗ere, the supervening event is the Menorca family鈥檚 leaving听 the country; and since they are supposedly the only true beneficiaries of the instant petition, proceeding with the case would merely waste the valuable time and resources of the court,鈥 the appeals court said.
鈥淭he actual substantial relief which the petitioner would be entitled to, i.e. the preservation of the quality of the right to life, liberty and security afforded by the writ of amparo cannot be enforced beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the Court,鈥 the decision stated.
The CA added that the cases filed against Menorca鈥攍ibel, adultery, among others 鈥 cannot be considered threats.
Concurring with the resolution are Associate Justices Magdangal M. De Leon and Elihu a. Yba帽ez. RAM/rga