Don鈥檛 be a Yasay.
Sen. Panfilo Lacson on Thursday urged Environment Secretary Gina Lopez to give adequate responses to questions raised by members of the Commission on Appointments (CA), noting how he found her answers 鈥渨anting鈥 when she first appeared before the body on Wednesday.
鈥淸It鈥檚] just a reminder that when you respond to questions raised by the members of the this commission, just bear in mind that you are here to convince us,鈥 Lacson said at the resumption of the hearing on Thursday.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 want you to suffer the fate of Secretary Yasay,鈥 he said, referring to the rejected appointment of designated Foreign Secretary Perfecto Yasay Jr.
As chair of the CA committee on foreign affairs, Lacson was the one who read out the bicameral body鈥檚 rejection of Yasay鈥檚 appointment at the plenary on Wednesday afternoon after it was found that the official had lied in saying he was never an American citizen.
The senator said he had almost moved for Lopez鈥檚 confirmation as early as Wednesday but noted how her responses to questions fell short of his expectations.
鈥淵esterday鈥檚 presentation was very impressive and convincing, so convincing that I had wanted to move to recommend her to the plenary. But the responses to the questions raised were wanting,鈥 Lacson said.
鈥淚鈥檓 saying this because I want to be as candid as the secretary. And I think the responses made were not enough to convince at least 13 (CA members) 鈥 . And I want to help you get past these confirmation hearings. That鈥檚 why I鈥檓 telling you this,鈥 he said.
An appointee needs the vote of majority of the 24-member CA committee to get a recommendation to the plenary.
The committee chair, Sen. Manny Pacquiao, seconded Lacson, saying the body meant to assess Lopez鈥檚 fitness as an appointee to the environment portfolio.
Occidental Mindoro Rep. Josephine Ramirez-Sato stressed that it was the job of CA members to probe nominees.
Opponents
On Thursday, Lopez faced a long queue of opponents of her appointment, including representatives from the mining and education sectors, who cited her lack of technical and scientific knowledge, poor appreciation of the law and disregard for due process in enforcing her policies.
The opponents also slammed her 鈥渋nability鈥 to explain the mineral production sharing agreement (MPSA) and several scientific terms, her manner of ordering the shutdown of mining operations and cancellation of exploration contracts, and her use of 鈥渁rbitrary鈥 standards in enforcing mining laws.
Lopez last month ordered the closure of 23 mines and canceled 75 MPSAs. She maintained that she followed the law, and that she was working for the common good and a sustainable way to use the country鈥檚 environmental endowments.
She said 82 percent of the mining industry鈥檚 net earnings, pegged at P35.5 billion, went to businessmen and not to communities facing environmental and health risks due to mining activities.
Unfit, unqualified
The Chamber of the Mines of the Philippines (COMP) said Lopez was unfit and unqualified to be the government鈥檚 lead regulator in natural resource development.
鈥淚s she competent to lead the DENR? Does she have the experience, education, impartiality and temperament to accomplish the department鈥檚 objectives?鈥 To all these questions, we say 鈥榥o, no and no!鈥欌 said Ronald Recidoro, the chamber鈥檚 vice president for legal and policy.
鈥淗er extreme ideology and environmental fanaticism will only cause a mess that will hurt many and benefit no one,鈥 he said.
Recidoro noted that Lopez 鈥減aints the mining industry as environmental rapists that just take what they want and leave nothing but suffering and destruction in their wake鈥 without considering the role of government regulation.
He cited how mining companies have to go through a strict process before starting operations. 鈥淢ining companies can鈥檛 just go into any area and mine any which way they want,鈥 Recidero told the CA.
Lopez rebuffed the COMP鈥檚 statement, saying: 鈥淭here were violations 鈥 People have suffered.鈥 She also asserted that 鈥渄ue process was followed every step of the way.鈥
鈥淚鈥檓 looking here for an economy where everyone will benefit 鈥 . Use land in a way that assures our future. Why does it have to be gold and minerals and whatever?聽 Why not look at biodiversity, ecotourism?鈥 she said.
Inadequate knowledge
Christian Uytico, the first to present his opposition on behalf of a group of engineers and scholars, said Lopez 鈥渉as inadequate technical and scientific knowledge to lead an agency鈥 that dealt heavily with science.
Mining and geology students from the University of the Philippines along with tribal leaders from mining communities also opposed Lopez鈥檚 appointment.
Lopez later asserted that she was coming from 鈥渁 space of compassion and love鈥 in response to the opposition of tribal and communities leaders, who expressed concern that their children might face an uncertain future with the sudden closure of mines in their areas.