Ex-Palawan Gov. Joel Reyes seeks dismissal of fertilizer scam case
Former Palawan Gov. Joel Reyes
Former Palawan Gov. Mario Joel Reyes has sought the dismissal of his fertilizer scam charges on the grounds of investigation delay by the Office of the Ombudsman.
In an eight-page motion to dismiss, Reyes echoed the Sandiganbayan Special Fifth Division’s findings in its March 15 resolution throwing out the case against Department of Agriculture regional technical director Rodolfo Guieb and DA regional executive director Dennis Araullo.
In the ruling, the court granted a similar motion to dismiss earlier filed by Guieb and adopted by Araullo, agreeing that their constitutional right to the speedy disposition of their cases was violated.
It said the Office of the Ombudsman took “even close to 12 years” to bring the case to the antigraft court on Sept. 14 last year, counted from the time fact-finding investigation began in May 24, 2004.
The same resolution also stressed that the Ombudsman caused prejudice to Guieb and Araullo, citing the difficulty of securing witnesses and documents after all the years, as well as their “psychological, financial and emotional burden.”
Article continues after this advertisementFor Reyes’ part, he claimed that the same findings should also apply to him and he should be cleared of the charges.
Article continues after this advertisement“The same resolution, its logic and the laws and jurisprudence it relied upon apply, and there is no reason not to apply the same squarely to Reyes who … is similarly situated with accused Guieb and Araullo,” his motion read.
“If we are to follow the constitutional mandate that all persons or things similarly situated should be treated alike … it is inevitable that the effects of the resolution dated 15 March 2017 should also be applied favorably to Reyes,” it said.
In the meantime, Reyes sought the deferment of his scheduled arraignment on April 4.
This marks Reyes’ second attempt to have his graft case thrown out before it heads to trial. He first filed a motion for judicial determination of probable cause, also adopted by Araullo, that questioned the basis of his indictment by the Ombudsman.
