Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO
Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales won鈥檛 buck from her position to dismiss the corruption cases of former President Benigno Aquino III just to please her critics.
In an interview with CNN Philippines鈥� 鈥淭he Source,鈥� Morales said she was sorry to disappoint her critics but as far as the Ombudsman was concerned, there was no probable cause to file charges against Aquino over the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP).
The DAP was a system of realigning savings to other agencies in a bid to stimulate the economy. It was perceived as then President Aquino鈥檚 pork barrel fund. The Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional some practices under DAP.
鈥淭hey want Aquino鈥檚 head. We go by the evidence. If the evidence is there, if it鈥檚 rearing its ugly head, why should we not file the case?鈥� Morales said.
鈥淏ut if the evidence does not merit the determination of probable cause, why should we go to court?鈥� she added.
Morales welcomed the decision of the Supreme Court to dismiss the disbarment case filed against her by defeated senatorial candidate Greco Belgica, who wanted the Ombudsman鈥檚 head for her refusal to hold Aquino accountable.
搁贰础顿:听Ombudsman on disbarment case: Wish them luck | Ombudsman聽hit for clearing Aquino on DAP
But Morales said if her critics, led by the Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption, who vowed to file an impeachment complaint against her, wanted her removed from office to force her to file charges against Aquino, she has this to say:
鈥淚f that is intended to scare me into filing a case against Aquino, even if the evidence does not warrant, I鈥檓 sorry to disappoint them.鈥�
Morales said she would not order the filing of charges before the Sandiganbayan against any public official just to subvert any attempt to impeach her.
鈥淭hey can file an impeachment complaint. I鈥檓 not going to be coerced into filing a case against someone, when I believe the evidence does not call for it,鈥� Morales said.
She said she was ready to hand over her 鈥渢hankless position鈥� on a 鈥渟ilver platter.鈥�
But she believes she committed no impeachment offense. 鈥淚 am confident, impeachment or no impeachment. As far as I鈥檓 concerned, I鈥檝e done nothing wrong that can fall under any ground for impeachment,鈥� Morales said.
Morales said she did not owe any debt of gratitude to Aquino, who appointed her as Ombudsman in 2011 after her retirement as Supreme Court Associate Justice.
鈥淓xcuse me, I did not ask for that position. In fact, I was hesitant to accept that position. I wanted the luxury of retirement. But nauto ako (I was duped),鈥� Morales said.
鈥淥f course, I was challenged,鈥� she added.
In her resolution,聽Morales聽acquitted Aquino and his budget secretary Florencio 鈥淏utch鈥� Abad of technical malversation because they were mere 鈥減olicy makers鈥� and not 鈥渁ccountable public officers鈥� in connection with the DAP.
The聽Ombudsman dismissed the graft complaint against Aquino and Abad after finding no evident bad faith or gross inexcusable negligence because the DAP was 鈥渕otivated by a good purpose to spur economic growth and boost the national economy.鈥�
Morales聽added that there was no bad faith on the part of Aquino because when the latter was senator he filed a bill seeking to limit executive influence on the General Appropriations Act and that Aquino knew beforehand that 鈥渁cts of tinkering with the annual GAA and fiscal dictatorship are contrary to the Constitution.鈥�
搁贰础顿:听Lawyers鈥� group insists Aquino, Abad liable for DAP
The Ombudsman acquitted Aquino of the usurpation of powers without giving an explanation. But it found probable cause to charge Abad with usurping the powers of the purse of Congress in realigning the country鈥檚 savings under DAP.
搁贰础顿:听Abad indicted for usurpation of powers over
As to the complaints against Aquino over the Mamasapano incident, Morales said the graft and usurpation of powers the Ombudsman filed against dismissed police officers Alan Purisima and Getulio Nape帽as did not include Aquino because the raps were filed when the president still had immunity in office.
鈥淪ome people are crowing at the Ombudsman for not filing a case against PNoy. What we filed was a complaint against Purisima and Nape帽as when PNoy was still in power,鈥� Morales said.
搁贰础顿:听Ombudsman vows not to sit on Aquino probe over Mamasapano听触
搁贰础顿:听Aquino: No 鈥榗ommand responsibility鈥� in Mamasapano raid听触聽Purisima, Nape帽as charged for Mamasapano carnage
Former president Aquino appointed聽Morales聽Ombudsman聽when the latter retired as Supreme Court associate justice in 2011.
Morales is set to retire on July 25 next year.
During the Meet the Inquirer forum on Dec. 2016,聽Morales聽called the former President Aquino 鈥渃orrupt-free.鈥�
鈥淵ou have to give it to him. He is corrupt-free,鈥澛燤orales聽said./rga
RELATED STORIES
Ombudsman聽on Aquino: He鈥檚 corrupt-free
Ombudsman: 5 cases vs Aquino still being probed
Ombudsman聽Morales聽on impeachment moves: Go on, baby