Nora Illi, the women鈥檚 representative of an unofficial group called the Islamic Central Committee of Switzerland, wears a niqab as she attends a Sunday night talkshow on November 6, 2016, in Berlin.聽The European Court of Human Rights on July 11, 2017, upheld a Belgian ban on wearing the full-face niqab veil in public, calling the restriction 鈥渘ecessary in a democratic society鈥�.聽AFP聽
STRASBOURG, France 鈥� The European Court of Human Rights on Tuesday upheld a Belgian ban on wearing the full-face niqab veil in public, calling the restriction 鈥渘ecessary in a democratic society鈥�.
The veil is a controversial issue across Europe, with some countries banning the garment in public in the name of safety and rights groups arguing that this amounts to a violation of civil liberties.
The court ruled that the ban sought to guarantee social cohesion, the 鈥減rotection of the rights and freedoms of others鈥� and that it was 鈥渘ecessary in a democratic society鈥�, a statement said.
The EU鈥檚 top rights court said a bye-law adopted in June 2008 in three Belgian municipalities 鈥渃ould be regarded as proportionate to the aim pursued, namely the preservation of the conditions of 鈥榣iving together鈥�.鈥�
It said a country should also be given a 鈥渨ide margin of appreciation in deciding whether and to what extent a limitation of the right to manifest one鈥檚 religion or beliefs was 鈥榥ecessary鈥�.鈥�
Belgian banned the wearing of the full-face veil in June 2011. It prohibits appearing in public 鈥渨ith a face masked or hidden, in whole or in part, in such a way as to be unidentifiable鈥�.
Violations can result in fines and up to seven days in jail.
In May 2012, pockets of riots broke out in the Brussels suburb of Molenbeek after a woman in a niqab was asked by two police officers to remove the garment.
France was the first European country to ban the niqab in April 2011 and there have been around 1,600 arrests since coming in to force.
The ECHR had already ruled on a challenge to the French law in 2014 when it also rejected arguments that the restriction breached religious freedom and individual human rights.
Ban 鈥榚nsures public safety鈥�
The Belgian case was brought by two Muslim women, Samia Belcacemi, a Belgian national, and Yamina Oussar, a Moroccan.
Both women said they chose of their own free will to wear the niqab and claimed their rights had been infringed and the law was discriminatory.
The court rejected this on Tuesday, saying that the law was designed to ensure 鈥減ublic safety, equality between men and women and a certain concept of living together in a society.鈥�
After Belgium introduced the ban, Belcacemi continued wearing the veil for a while but stopped because of social pressure and fears she would be fined.
Oussar told the court that she had decided to stay at home, the statement from the court said. CBB