CA overrules lower court, bars Veloso testimony vs alleged recruiters | Inquirer

CA overrules lower court, bars Veloso testimony vs alleged recruiters

By: - Reporter /
/ 10:15 AM January 05, 2018

Student protesters hold a picture of Mary Jane Veloso, a Filipino convicted drug trafficker in Indonesia, as they urge Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte to save her from execution during a rally near the Malacanang presidential palace in Manila, Philippines on Tuesday, Sept. 13, 2016. Duterte visited Indonesia last week where he discussed the fate of Veloso with his Indonesian counterpart Joko Widodo. (AP Photo/Aaron Favila)

Student protesters hold a picture of Mary Jane Veloso, a Filipino convicted drug trafficker in Indonesia, as they urge Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte to save her from execution during a rally near Malacañang in Manila, Philippines on Tuesday, September 13, 2016. (AP FILE PHOTO)

The Court of Appeals (CA) has overturned a local court’s order allowing Mary Jane Veloso – the Filipino detained in Indonesia’s death row due to drug trafficking – to testify against her alleged recruiters through a deposition.

The CA’s Former Eleventh Division granted the petition filed by Veloso’s alleged recruiters, Ma. Cristina Sergio and Julius Lacanilao, to reverse and set aside the ruling of the Nueva Ecija Regional Trial Court (RTC).

Article continues after this advertisement

Sergio and Lacanilao were facing human trafficking charges for allegedly duping Veloso to smuggle illegal drugs in Indonesia in 2010. They were under police custody.

FEATURED STORIES

Nueva Ecija RTC Branch 88 Judge Anarica Castillo-Reyes ordered the Philippine Consulate in Indonesia to secure Veloso’s deposition from her cell in Wirongunan Penitentiary in Indonesia.

However, Veloso’s alleged recruiters argued that her deposition would violate their right to directly confront the witnesses against them as guaranteed under Section 14, paragraph 1 of the 1987 Constitution.

Article continues after this advertisement

The CA agreed with the petitioners that Veloso should be present before a trial if she were to testify.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Generally, the examination of witnesses must be done orally before a judge in open court,” the appellate court said in the 18-page decision dated December 13, 2017.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This is true especially in criminal cases where the Constitution secures to the accused his right to a public trial and to meet the witnesses against him face to face,” the court said.

Last April 29, 2015, the Indonesian government postponed Veloso’s execution on the ground that her testimony was needed to prosecute and convict her alleged recruiters.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Veloso execution stopped

However, the Indonesian government imposed the following conditions to halt the execution: Veloso should remain in detention, no cameras would be used in taking the testimony, none of her lawyers would be present when she testifies, and that the questions must be in writing.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

With the Nueva Ecija RTC’s order overturned, Veloso would not be able to testify against Sergio and Lacanilao.                 /kga

www
business
www
globalnation
opinion
TAGS: Court of Appeals, Drug trafficking, Indonesia

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

© Copyright 1997-2024 | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.