Most parents are living the life of 鈥渆mpty nesters鈥 by the time their children reach 30 but one US couple had to go to court to give their son that extra little push.
Michael Rotondo, who was still living in his parents鈥 home in New York at that age, argued he was not a burden to them, saying they 鈥渄on鈥檛 provide laundry or food.鈥
鈥淲e don鈥檛 talk, we stay out of each other鈥檚 way,鈥 Rotondo told US media.
鈥淚 just want 鈥 a reasonable amount of time to vacate with consideration to the fact that I was not really prepared to support myself at the time where I was served these notices,鈥 he also said.
A 鈥渞easonable amount of time,鈥 in his view, was six months but his parents disagreed, sending him notices directing him to leave, including one that said they were providing $1,100 for him to find his own accommodations, US media reported.
Speaking to CNN on Wednesday, he admitted the atmosphere at home was 鈥渧ery tense鈥 and 鈥渧ery awkward.鈥
鈥淚鈥檒l leave, I don鈥檛 like living here, but I need reasonable time,鈥 he reiterated.
鈥淚 have plans to be able to provide myself with the income I need to support myself. But it鈥檚 not something that鈥檚 going to come together tomorrow,鈥 he added.
A lawyer for Rotondo鈥檚 parents had argued in court: 鈥淭hey have no obligation to provide support; he鈥檚 well over the age of 21.鈥 The state鈥檚 age of majority in fact is 18.
鈥淭here is no reason for these people to have him in their home,鈥 the lawyer said.
The judge agreed and granted the eviction.
Rotondo condemned the decision and said he plans to appeal 鈥 although he added that he would not appeal if his parents allowed him three months to move out.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 see why the judge wants to throw people out on the street,鈥 he told US media.
Rotondo is far from the only older child still living at home in the US. According to a Pew Research Center study, nearly a third of 18 to 34-year-olds lived with their parents in 2016. /kga