{"id":2044592,"date":"2025-03-17T17:56:37","date_gmt":"2025-03-17T09:56:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newsinfo.inquirer.net\/?p=2044592"},"modified":"2025-03-18T16:28:29","modified_gmt":"2025-03-18T08:28:29","slug":"dutertes-icc-arrest-separating-fact-from-lies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsinfo.inquirer.net\/2044592\/dutertes-icc-arrest-separating-fact-from-lies","title":{"rendered":"Duterte\u2019s ICC arrest: Separating fact from lies"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"FORMER<\/a>

FORMER PRESIDENT Rodrigo Duterte composite image from Inquirer files\/ICC<\/p><\/div>\n

MANILA, Philippines \u2014 The International Criminal Court (ICC)\u2019s arrest warrant against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has sparked a firestorm of reactions, with supporters calling it a political attack and critics hailing it as a long-overdue step toward justice. As misinformation spreads across social media, it is essential to separate fact from speculation.<\/p>\n

On March 11, 2025, former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte was arrested at Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) in Manila upon his return from Hong Kong. The arrest was carried out based on a warrant issued by the ICC, which accused him of crimes against humanity related to extrajudicial killings (EJKs) during his war on drugs and his time as mayor of Davao City and later as the president between 2016 and 2022.<\/p>\n

After the arrest, Duterte was immediately transferred to ICC custody. By March 12, 2025, the ICC confirmed that he was detained at The Hague, where he will undergo trial<\/p>\n

READ: EXPLAINER: What\u2019s next after arrest of Rodrigo Duterte?<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Despite the arrest being carried out under proper legal procedures, various narratives have surfaced online, questioning the legitimacy of the warrant and the ICC\u2019s authority. This article examines the major claims surrounding Duterte\u2019s arrest and how they hold up against verified sources, ICC documents, and international law.<\/p>\n

Claim 1: The ICC warrant cites only 43 Deaths, weakening the case<\/h2>\n