FILE PHOTO
MANILA, Philippines鈥擡arlier this year, cases of COVID-19 in the Philippines dropped despite eased pandemic restrictions. However, cases surged again starting last month, with the nationwide positivity rate hitting as high as 17 percent.
鈥淔or now, our COVID-19 cases are plateauing, it is going down, [but] we have a few areas being monitored where COVID-19 admissions are increasing a little,鈥� said Health Undersecretary Maria Rosario Vergeire, Department of Health (DOH) officer-in-charge, last January.
Vergeire also said that the country鈥檚 COVID situation was 鈥済enerally manageable鈥� given the decrease in the nationwide positivity rate. Records from DOH showed that cases of COVID-19 continued to fall聽from January聽until February this year.
According to data from the health department鈥檚 COVID-19 case bulletins, the weekly additional cases dropped to 832鈥攐r around 119 average daily cases鈥攆or聽February 20 to 26.
However, new COVID-19 cases saw a significant increase in April. A case bulletin report by the health department showed that an average of 450 infections per day were recorded from April 17 to 23.
It further increased by 42 percent from April 24 to 30, with an average of 637 daily COVID cases.
GRAPHIC Ed Lustan
As of May 3, total COVID cases have reached 4,096,335. Of those, 7,565 were marked as active cases, 4,022,326 have recovered, and 66,444 died.
Amid the recent surge of infections, Vergeire said the number of daily COVID cases in the country may remain at 600 until June.
鈥淏ased on the projections, we are seeing that the number of cases will increase by up to 600 until June. Eventually, hopefully, the cases will start to go down after that month,鈥� she said at a press briefing.
However, for health reform advocate and former special adviser to the National Task Force on COVID-19 Dr. Tony聽Leachon, estimates by the DOH might be lower than the actual numbers鈥攃iting the rising nationwide positivity rate.
鈥淲e have rising positivity rate close to 18%. We have not seen the peak or even the plateau.聽That鈥檚 why maybe they鈥檙e disregarding positivity rate,鈥� Leachon said in a tweet posted on May 3.
鈥淪o why are we testing if we don鈥檛 value positivity rate? How do we stop the surge by doing status quo measures?聽 It is truly disturbing. Hopeful for enlightenment from [DOH],鈥� he added.
In a separate tweet, Leachon attributed the increasing nationwide positivity rate to the 鈥渘ew Omicron XBB1.16 subvariant known as Arcturus, optional masking, complacency, increase in mobility, and waning wall of immunity.鈥�
Rising positivity rate
Data from independent pandemic monitor OCTA Research showed that聽last February 6, the country鈥檚 positivity rate鈥攖he percentage of all COVID-19 tests that turned out positive for the virus鈥攚as 1.20 percent, the lowest so far since January.
Two months later, the nationwide positivity rate hit 7.40 percent on April 14, following the health department鈥檚 announcement that multiple cases of Omicron subvariant XBB.1.9.1 have been detected in the Philippines.
READ: PH logs cases of Omicron XBB.1.9.1 COVID-19 subvariant
As of May 3, the positivity rate in the Philippines rose to 17.1 percent鈥攖he highest so far this year.
GRAPHIC Ed Lustan
However, Vergeire explained that the nationwide COVID-19 positivity rate is not a good basis for assessing the country鈥檚 COVID-19 situation as it is only derived from the number of individuals who have tested positive for COVID-19 in a specific number of RT-PCR tests conducted.
鈥淟et me remind everybody that the positivity rate is not a good basis to tell the country鈥檚 COVID situation,鈥� Vergeire said.
鈥淣o matter how high these positivity rates are, those are not accurate [basis] that can give us the picture and the situation that we have for COVID right now,鈥� she said at a media briefing last May 2, speaking in a mix of English and Filipino.
The health undersecretary stressed that currently, there is a 鈥渢remendous decrease鈥� in RT-PCR tests that are being done in the country.
鈥淲e know that the positivity rate is affected by the number of those who undergo RT-PCR tests for COVID. [M]ost of our citizens right now are using antigen, some are not having any tests at all [and] are just isolating themselves when they are sick,鈥� said Vergeire.
Vergeire also previously said that it would be unfair for local governments and other sectors if the health department declared that the country is at high risk based only on the positivity rate.
Low utilization rate
Last month, amid increasing COVID cases, the DOH told the public that there was no need to panic as the health utilization rate, or available beds and services against occupancy, remained low throughout the country.
鈥淭he most important thing to look at and focus on is the utilization of the hospital, so even if we see that there is an increase in cases until we see that the utilization,鈥� Vergeire said.
鈥淩est assured to all of our citizens, our hospitals are ready, we have gone through different variants already, especially during the delta period, and we have learned our lesson,鈥� she continued.
READ: DOH: Low COVID-19 health utilization rate means we鈥檙e okay, no need to panic
GRAPHIC Ed Lustan
According to DOH鈥檚 nationwide facilities data, as of May 1, there are 1,887 available facilities in the country for COVID-19 cases. The majority, or around 1,440 facilities, were classified as low risk鈥攐r 0 to 49 percent occupancy rate.
In terms of bed occupancy rate, 17.2 percent of all 24,430 beds for COVID-19 is currently occupied. This translates to 4,207 occupied beds and 20,223 vacant beds鈥攚hich consists of 2,411 ICU beds and 22,019 non-ICU beds.
While the country鈥檚 health care utilization rate (HCUR) remained low, Leachon stressed that it has been 鈥渋ncreasing gradually.鈥�
鈥淢ild cases expected but we can鈥檛 predict the future. The best is to prevent further surge while it鈥檚 manageable,鈥� he said.
To mask or not to mask?
Following the rise in COVID-19 cases, President Ferdinand 鈥淏ongbong鈥� Marcos Jr.聽last May 1 said that the government might bring back the mandatory use of face masks鈥攄epending on the recommendations of the DOH and Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases (IATF).
鈥淲e鈥檒l see if the IAFT and the DOH will have guidance I hope we don鈥檛 have to, but we might. But I hope not,鈥� he said in an interview with reporters.
READ: Marcos: Gov鈥檛 might require use of face mask again amid rising COVID cases
On May 2, however, the DOH said there was no need to reimpose the mandatory face mask rule.
鈥淲e already have recommended to the Office of the President, based on the agreements coming from the IATF discussions, that there is no need to return the mandate. We need to shift the mindset of our countrymen,鈥� Vergeire announced.
鈥淐ases will increase and decrease in our country because the virus is here, it will not disappear, and the virus will mutate and produce variants every now and then,鈥� she added.
GRAPHIC Ed Lustan
Vergeire explained that what the public needed was for each individual to know how to protect themselves and their family鈥攂y choosing to wear a mask when going to high-risk places, especially if they are unvaccinated, immunocompromised, senior citizens, or pregnant.
READ: DOH: No need to reimpose mandatory face mask rule
In a television interview over CNN Philippines鈥� The Source, the health undersecretary explained that the DOH might recommend reimposing the mandatory use of face masks if the country鈥檚 COVID situation becomes critical.
鈥淚 am still an advocate of masking, DOH is still an advocate of masking, but we need to understand that we cannot go back and forth with our policies for COVID-19,鈥� said Vergeire.
鈥淲e cannot go back to our restrictions every time there would be an increase in cases. We need to move forward on this,鈥� she added.
Leachon, on the other hand, questioned the DOH recommendation.
鈥淲hy wait for escalation of COVID cases? Sense of urgency is key. I don鈥檛 understand the rationale behind this decision,鈥� he said in a tweet.
鈥淸W]e need to protect the people with the rising positivity rate. We need to make face masks mandatory and make it optional once the cases are controlled. But doing nothing is quite a big letdown because we will be perpetuating an error in the past.聽 It鈥檚 about public safety,鈥� he added.
He emphasized that the use of face masks remains the cheapest, most important protective measure and the least disruptive of the minimum public health standards (MPHS) against COVID-19.
鈥淲earing face masks should be a way of life while we are trying to upgrade our booster rates and improve our聽fragile and weak healthcare system.鈥�
READ: Expert: Masks a must with new variants