SC acquits man charged with coconut theft | Inquirer

ACCUSED ‘BELIEVED IN GOOD FAITH’ LAND WAS OWNED BY KIN

SC acquits man charged with coconut theft

By: - Reporter /
/ 05:50 AM February 01, 2024

QC prosecutor dismisses effigy Sona burning complaint

stock images

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court has acquitted a man of qualified theft based on reasonable doubt as he “believed in good faith” that the parcel of land where he harvested coconuts was owned by his grandfather.

In a 12-page decision, the high tribunal’s Second Division reversed the 2016 decision of a Bohol Regional Trial Court that initially sentenced Pedro Amarille to serve eight to 14 years in prison for stealing 200 coconuts worth P2,000.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court also reversed a Court of Appeals’ resolution that modified his sentence to an indeterminate penalty of imprisonment ranging from two to six years.

FEATURED STORIES

Amarille’s case dates back to 2011 when he gathered coconuts from the plantation of the heirs of Macario Jabines and turned these into copra or sun-dried coconut meat yielding coconut oil.

In a conference settlement, he insisted that the land was owned by his grandfather, Eufemio.

Article continues after this advertisement

Both parties later signed an agreement under which Amarille would no longer gather coconuts from the Jabines property and also turn over the copra to barangay officials. However, he failed to comply because he sold the copra and kept the money for himself.

Article continues after this advertisement

The high court ruled that Amarille merely relied on a tax declaration which indicated that the land in question was in the name of his grandfather, Eufemio Amarille.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Thus, Pedro could not be faulted for asserting his ownership over the subject land. Indeed, he believed in good faith that the property indicated in the tax declaration was the same property subject of the case,” it said.

But the court pointed out that tax declarations were not “conclusive evidence of ownership.”

Article continues after this advertisement

It also cited records showing that Amarille had been tilling the parcel of land since 1986 so his gathering of coconuts was “based on his honest belief that he owned the land where the coconut trees were planted.”

Despite his acquittal, Amarille was ordered to pay the heirs of Jabines the amount he got from selling the copra.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

TAGS: coconut theft, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

© Copyright 1997-2024 | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.