Benhur Luy. 黑料社 photo
MANILA, Philippines鈥揃enhur Luy and other former employees of JLN Corp. had to use their both hands in forging the signatures of incorporators and beneficiaries of foundations organized by alleged pork barrel racket architect Janet Lim Napoles.
Luy made this revelation when he returned to the witness stand in the Sandiganbayan on Thursday at the hearing of the petition for bail of Napoles and detained Sen. Bong Revilla.
In his testimony, the primary government witness in the P10-billion pork barrel scam, told the antigraft court鈥檚 first division that Napoles had instructed him and his coworkers to intentionally make their handwriting unattractive 鈥渢o make it appear that those were the signatures of farmers.鈥�
The whistle-blower also disclosed that he got at least P3 million in facilitating the multibillion-peso livelihood projects funneled into Napoles鈥� nongovernment organizations.
鈥淯pon the instruction of Madam, we forged the signatures of the persons on the list of beneficiaries. Because there were so many names, we needed to use our left and right hands,鈥� Luy said, gesturing how he signed the documents with his two hands.
Names of classmates, friends
In his cross-examination handled by Stephen David, one of Napoles鈥� counsels, the witness said he included the names of his classmates and friends as incorporators of six NGOs purportedly on orders of Napoles.
鈥淢adam said we should make our penmanship ugly so it would look like the signatures of farmers. She even wanted us to just print our thumb marks over the names of the beneficiaries,鈥� he said, drawing laughter from the people inside the courtroom.
At times, he said Napoles herself and her children鈥擩o Christine and James Christopher鈥攚ould help them sign the list of beneficiaries and other documents pertaining to the disbursement of the projects financed by the Priority Development Assistance Fund, the pork barrel of lawmakers.
On Napoles鈥� order
Asked by David why he and other employees of the Napoles-owned JLN Corp. falsified the signatures despite them knowing that it was a criminal act, Luy said they were merely complying with the order of Napoles.
鈥淲e are just employees of Madam so we just followed what she told us to do. She controls the foundations. The instructions we got came from her,鈥� Luy told David.
The lawyer retorted, 鈥淪o all of those are just instructions of Ms. Napoles? It took you eight long years to make you realize that she was making a fool out of you?鈥�
But State Prosecutor Joefferson Toribio opposed David鈥檚 manner of questioning, saying the defense counsel was already making conclusions and not posing questions to the witness.
Associate Justice Efren de la Cruz, chair of the division, sustained Toribio鈥檚 objection and ordered David to 鈥渁sk him (Luy) the proper questions.鈥�
鈥淕o to another point counsel鈥�. Don鈥檛 be carried away,鈥� De la Cruz told Napoles鈥� lawyer.
For truth to come out
Sensing that David was trying to destroy his credibility by questioning his bank accounts and other properties, an animated Luy insisted that he decided to testify against his cousin 鈥渇or the truth to come out.鈥�
鈥淲e鈥檙e not trying to be superheroes. We are just telling the truth,鈥� he said, holding back his emotions.
In his testimony, Luy narrated that he started working as Napoles鈥� personal assistant in September 2002 with a monthly salary of P8,000.
Two years later, he organized the Social Development Program for Farmers Foundation Inc. ostensibly on Napoles鈥� prodding with him as president. Among the incorporators of the NGO was a certain Ferdinand Navarro Tantoco, who Luy said was a fellow marathoner.
Promise of commission
According to the witness, Napoles promised him and the other presidents of the foundations half percent of the total project cost as their commission.
But Napoles did not make good on her promise and just gave them small amounts, Luy claimed.
On one occasion, he said she gave him P30,000 as commission when he should have received P250,000.