Foreign affairs secretary Perfecto Yasay faces the grilling of the Commission on appointment at the Senate. Inquirer/Grig C. Montegrande
Lawmakers on Wednesday rejected the nomination of Foreign Secretary Perfecto Yasay Jr. after ruling that he lied to them about his American citizenship.
By rejecting his nomination, the Commission on Appointments (CA) effectively fired Yasay, throwing the Philippines鈥� diplomatic leadership into turmoil at an important time for the country, which holds the rotating chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean).
Sen. Panfilo Lacson, chair of the CA鈥檚 foreign relations committee, said President Duterte could not reappoint Yasay.
Acting secretary to be named
Malaca帽ang said Mr. Duterte would name an acting foreign secretary.
Presidential spokesperson Ernesto Abella said the Office of the Executive Secretary would communicate with the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) by 8 a.m. Thursday.
鈥淎nnouncement will be forthwith,鈥� Abella said.
The DFA spokesperson, Assistant Secretary Charles Jose, said the department would wait for Mr. Duterte鈥檚 appointment of an acting secretary.
It was unclear on Wednesday what steps the government would take against Yasay for concealing his US citizenship as he served as associate commissioner at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) from 1993 to 1995 and as chair of the body from 1995 to 2000.
Yasay also unsuccessfully ran for a seat in the Senate in 2001 and 2004, and for Vice President in 2010.
He was the first Duterte nominee to be rejected by the CA.
In an extremely rare move, the CA unanimously voted to reject Yasay鈥檚 nomination following tense confirmation hearings in which he admitted to misleading the lawmakers.
鈥淗e was not telling the truth. He was not being forthright in the question-and-answer portion of the (confirmation) hearings,鈥� Lacson said.
Yasay, appointed by Mr. Duterte at the start of his administration eight months ago, told the initial hearing on Feb. 22 that he had never been an American citizen and that he had never held a US passport.
But the Inquirer, citing documents that contradicted Yasay鈥檚 declaration, reported on Feb. 27 that Yasay was granted American citizenship in 1986.
The documents also showed that Yasay formally renounced his American citizenship at the US Embassy in Manila on June 28 last year, just two days before Mr. Duterte appointed him to head the DFA.
Apology and admission
In a television interview on Monday, Yasay admitted he once carried a US passport, but said he had returned it along with his naturalization certificate.
He said he renounced his US citizenship in 1993 and that the document he filed in Manila last year was only for confirmation and reiteration of his renunciation.
On Wednesday, Yasay faced the CA again and was grilled over the documents that showed he was granted US citizenship in 1986.
He insisted that he never lied about his citizenship but apologized for 鈥渋nadvertently misleading鈥� the commission.
His last stand collapsed when Mindoro Rep. Josephine Ramirez-Sato asked him to answer categorically yes or no whether he once became an American citizen.
鈥淚 wish I could answer that question with a yes or no, but as directly as I could in answering that question, I have always admitted that I was granted US citizenship. That鈥檚 my answer,鈥� Yasay said.
鈥淚 was granted US citizenship [on] Nov. 26, 1986, but it鈥檚 my position that that grant of US citizenship at that time was void,鈥� he added.
Yasay held that he was 鈥渋neligible and disqualified鈥� to become a US citizen because he had no intention to reside in the United States, a view that he stated in an affidavit that he handed to Sato after the initial hearing on Feb. 22.
On Wednesday, he told the lawmakers that his US citizenship was void because the US Immigration and Nationality Act 鈥減rovides that anyone who has preconceived intent to abandon his residency at the time of application is disqualified to that grant.鈥�
鈥淎m I to believe you can lose [your] American citizenship by your own personal preconceived intention that you will not permanently reside in the US?鈥� Sato asked Yasay, reminding him that he swore allegiance to the United States when he took his oath as a US citizen.
鈥淔or lack of a better term, you fooled the USA when you applied for citizenship with a preconceived intention not to reside permanently in the US and abandon your citizenship in that country. Were you truthful in your oath [to] that country?鈥� Sato asked.
Replying, Yasay admitted there was a 鈥渕isrepresentation on my part for not divulging that.鈥�
Vote to reject
San Juan Rep. Ronaldo Zamora moved to end the questioning of Yasay, and the 15 committee members withdrew behind closed doors to vote whether to reject or confirm his nomination.
Later, on the floor, Lacson announced the body鈥檚 unanimous decision to reject Yasay鈥檚 nomination.
鈥淟et this be a reminder to everyone present in this hall, that by definition, an oath is a solemn declaration, accompanied by a swearing to God or a revered person or thing, that one鈥檚 statement is true or that one will be bound to a promise,鈥� Lacson said.
鈥淭he person making the oath invites punishment if the statement is untrue or the promise is broken. The legal effect of an oath is to subject the person to penalties for perjury if the testimony is false,鈥� he said. 鈥�WITH REPORTS FROM LEILA B. SALAVERRIA, JEANNETTE I. ANDRADE, MAILA AGER AND AFP
RELATED VIDEO